Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), a member of the Committee, questioned financial planning experts about ways to expand access to retirement plans to small business employees. Washington, D.C. – At a Senate Aging Committee hearing focused on building a stronger retirement system for all Americans, U.S.
Who is the sponser for the national academies press download#
Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.Click HERE to watch Senator Collins’ Q&A on SECURE Act. Click HERE for high-resolution video.Ĭlick HERE to watch Senator Collins’ Q&A on SIMPLE Plan Modernization Act. Click HERE for high-resolution video.
View our suggested citation for this chapter. Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email. To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter. Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book. Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one. Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.ĭo you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features? No Thanks Take a Tour » You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Appendix E: Abbreviations and Acronyms 84–86.Appendix C: Planning Committee and Staff Biographies 76–79.Appendix B: Additional Discussion Questions from Sponsor 75.7 Wrap-Up Discussion: Identifying Key Implications and Open Questions 61–70.5 Security Risks of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Systems 44–53.
4 Adversarial Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity: Research and Development and Emerging Areas 31–43.3 Currently Deployed Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Tools for Cyber Defense Operations 22–30.2 Artificial Intelligence and the Landscape of Cyber Engagements 9–21.Are there other areas of AI research, beyond ML, that are significant from a cyber threat or cybersecurity perspective?.How will the proliferation and adoption of ML change the potential consequences (including physical, economic, or psychological impacts) of cyberattacks? Does the answer assume significant qualitative or quantitative improvement in global cyber defenses? If these improvements do not materialize, how would the answer change?.What countries or companies are investing in the application of ML to their cybersecurity processes, and what are these company or country partnerships?.What are the key challenges and barriers to ML adoption for cybersecurity by businesses and governments?.What is the biggest “ask” the cybersecurity community could make of the ML community?.What are the key cybersecurity problems that can be solved using ML? What AI and ML techniques are well suited for cybersecurity? What are areas of cybersecurity that ML show great promise for resolving? What are areas of cybersecurity that will prove challenging to address using ML?.What is the current progress in the conceptualization, development, and adoption of ML in the cyberattack and cybersecurity processes, such as in components of the cyber kill chain and cybersecurity operations.They were provided to all workshop participants and discussed during the workshop’s final session. Several key questions, listed below, were identified by the sponsor as key to the discussion. Additional Discussion Questions from Sponsor
0 kommentar(er)
